Re: DROP TYPE/DROP DOMAIN
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DROP TYPE/DROP DOMAIN |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17765.1060176824@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DROP TYPE/DROP DOMAIN ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: DROP TYPE/DROP DOMAIN
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > But should the CREATE DOMAIN manual page refer to DROP TYPE? Should DROP > DOMAIN be able to drop a type? <shrug> Don't care much about either of those; the current state of affairs is fine with me. > What happens in the future if for some > reason we need to add some special case to dropDomain() and the coder > neglects to add it to dropType()? That would be a bug without regard for any of this discussion, because both RemoveDomain and RemoveType are simply user interface routines; they do no actual work. If someone put actual work into either, it'd be wrong because it would not get done during a cascaded drop. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: