Re: Do you recommend 8.4 or 9.0 for basic usage?
От | Joshua Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do you recommend 8.4 or 9.0 for basic usage? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17760702.4118.1306085568877.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Do you recommend 8.4 or 9.0 for basic usage? ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do you recommend 8.4 or 9.0 for basic usage?
Re: Do you recommend 8.4 or 9.0 for basic usage? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
MauMau, > Could you give me your frank opinions about which of 8.4 or 9.0 you > recommend to ISVs who embed PostgreSQL? So, first of all, you posted this question to the wrong list. pgsql-general or pgsql-admin would have been more appropriatefor this question. That being said, I find your statistics on bug fixes interesting, so thank you for collecting them. However, at this time there have already been four update releases for 9.0, so you can be fairly assured that any major bugshave been fixed. 9.0 was definitely a higher patch release (and longer beta) than 8.4 specifically because of streamingreplication & hot standby. Those are major, complex features which offer the opportunity for issues which onlyoccur in multi-server configurations and are thus hard to test for. Our company has multiple ISV clients who are deploying products built on 9.0.X, and to date have had no special issues. As an ISV, though, you need to devise a plan whereby you can apply update releases to your client's machines if they areconnected to the internet. One of the primary reasons for update releases is closing security holes, which means thatyou need to have a way to upgrade your customers. Some of the biggest issues we've seen in our clients is that an inabilityto apply in-the-field updates causing customers to experience bugs which have long been fixed in PostgreSQL releases. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: