Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17750.940863733@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch (Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE> writes: > On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Mike Mascari wrote: >> So in the example you gave above, you could put a comment >> on each of the two functions which compose the operator >> and a command on the operator itself. Two functions? An operator only has one underlying function. (Aggregates have as many as three though.) > Try \do and see for yourself. The fix should be rather simple but I'm not > sure where those descriptions are generated actually. The default contents of pg_description come from the DESCR() macros in include/catalog/*.h. It looks like only pg_proc and pg_type have any useful info in them in the current state of the source. I'm guessing that psql's \do actually looks for a description attached to the underlying function, rather than one attached to the operator. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: