Re: Postgres High Availablity Solution needed for hot-standby and load balancing

WHich solution are you using now, Guido?

Has anyone made experiences with cybercluster? I am thankful to hear
comments
and especially comparision to other products

thanks
Ragnar


> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Guido Neitzer
> Sent: Freitag, 30. November 2007 21:03
> To: Shane Ambler
> Cc: Postgresql General
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres High Availablity Solution
> needed for hot-standby and load balancing
>
> On 30.11.2007, at 12:50, Shane Ambler wrote:
>
> >> I project where the "latest news" page shows the newest entry from
> >> March 2005 and the install talks only about PostgreSQL 8.0 isn't
> >> really inspiring confidence ...
> >
> > Although they aren't the fastest with releases, they really
> aren't as
> > bad as that.
>
> Nicely said ... ;-) Yeah, I was looking at the wrong site.
> Maybe there should be a redirect to the new page to avoid that.
>
> I have last looked at pgcluster back in 2005 when I was
> trying to find an affordable multi master solution an the
> setup sounded so horrific that we spent about 10k EUR to get
> a different solution that is actually working fine now.
> Setting this up on just two machines was about 10 minutes work ...
>
> I hope the setup has changed to the better.
>
> cug
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>