Re: Odd numeric->float4/8 casting behaviour
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Odd numeric->float4/8 casting behaviour |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17690.1167927677@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Odd numeric->float4/8 casting behaviour (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Odd numeric->float4/8 casting behaviour
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > I believe this is happening because the numeric is being cast to float8 and > then the float4-float8 cross-data-type operator is being used. It seems like > it would be preferable to cast it to float4 and use the non-cross-data-type > operator. They're both marked as implicit casts so I'm unclear what decides > which gets used. Without having traced through the code, I think the fact that float8 is a "preferred type" is driving it. It's not clear whether we could change this without getting into a "can't resolve ambiguous operator" problem. > Also, as a side note I was surprised to find the above being parsed as > -(0.999::numeric(3,3)) rather than (-0.999)::numeric(3,3) is that expected? Yeah, :: binds VERY tightly. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: