Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17661.1293472202@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на |
Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include |
Ответы |
Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun dic 27 13:54:56 -0300 2010: >> [ lightbulb ] ... although we could improve that quite a bit if we >> processed each .h file separately instead of insisting on smashing >> everything into one compilation. Let me go try that. > FWIW I have this patch lingering about that I wrote months ago, to check > for header problems (not C++ stuff, just things like forgetting to > include some necessary header in some other header). Since it needs a > lot of polish (needs to ignore certain headers, and avoid leave > lingering files around), I didn't commit it; and I haven't updated it to > the new Make recursive stuff, either. src/tools/pginclude/ already contains several scripts for this sort of thing. Bruce runs them by hand occasionally, although I just found out that he's evidently not run the does-each-header-compile-standalone test in awhile. It would probably pay to automate these. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: