Re: libpq object hooks
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq object hooks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17642.1210951805@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq object hooks (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq object hooks
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > All of this is getting quite a long way from what was in the commitfest > queue. Do we still want to try to get this in this cycle, or should it > be marked returned to author for more work? So far I think it still falls within the category of allowing the author to revise his work. I don't want to hold commitfest open waiting on revisions of this patch, but as long as there's still other stuff being worked through I don't see why they can't keep trying. Just for the record, I would really like to close this fest before PGCon starts. We still have a couple more days to get it done. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: