BUG #17623: WHERE should be evaluated after FROM clause when operators may throw
От | PG Bug reporting form |
---|---|
Тема | BUG #17623: WHERE should be evaluated after FROM clause when operators may throw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17623-2bef2f4ff7fe8051@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17623: WHERE should be evaluated after FROM clause when operators may throw
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 17623 Logged by: Stamatis Zampetakis Email address: zabetak@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 14.5 Operating system: Debian 10.2.1-6 Description: Steps to reproduce: CREATE TABLE emp (empno INT, name VARCHAR, deptno INT); INSERT INTO emp VALUES (0, 'Alex', 0); INSERT INTO emp VALUES (10, 'Bob', 1); CREATE TABLE dept (deptno INT); INSERT INTO dept VALUES (1); SELECT e.name FROM emp e INNER JOIN dept d ON e.deptno = d.deptno WHERE (10 / e.empno) = 1 Actual output: ERROR: division by zero Expected output: Bob The error is caused since the filter condition in the WHERE clause is evaluated before the join. Filter push-down is a very common and powerful optimization but when there are operators in the WHERE clause that may throw (such as division, cast, etc) this optimization is unsafe. The SQL standard (Section 7.4 general rule 1) mandates that WHERE should be applied to the result of FROM so in the case above pushing filters below the join seems to violate the standard. Citing the standard: "If all optional clauses are omitted, then the result of the <table expression> is the same as the result of the <from clause>. Otherwise, each specified clause is applied to the result of the previously specified clause and the result of the <table expression> is the result of the application of the last specified clause." One of the optional clauses mentioned in the previous paragraph is the <where clause>. There seems to be a clearly defined order between the <from clause>, which includes inner joins, and the <where clause>.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: