Re: Why we have tuplestore and tuplesort?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Why we have tuplestore and tuplesort?
Дата
Msg-id 17605.1250363972@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Why we have tuplestore and tuplesort?  (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Why we have tuplestore and tuplesort?  (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> writes:
> Looking for git/cvs log a bit, tuplesort was already there since 1999
> while tuplestore was introduced around 2000 for materialized node. Why
> then was tuplestore invented as a new feature instead of extending
> tuplesort? Can't we unit them now?

I think they'd be unmaintainable if merged.  Each one is complicated
enough as-is, and they have different concerns and different use-cases
to optimize for.  Moreover it's not clear that merging them would buy us
much --- saving one copy step doesn't excite me, even if it actually
came out to be true which I'm unconvinced about.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hitoshi Harada
Дата:
Сообщение: Why we have tuplestore and tuplesort?
Следующее
От: Hitoshi Harada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why we have tuplestore and tuplesort?