Re: disabling seq scans
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: disabling seq scans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17602.1080879381@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: disabling seq scans ("Marcus Andree S. Magalhaes" <marcus.magalhaes@vlinfo.com.br>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
"Marcus Andree S. Magalhaes" <marcus.magalhaes@vlinfo.com.br> writes: > But, since we're using pooled connections, we must be extra > careful and ensure all connections have the enable_seqscan > reset to its default. If you are concerned about failing to reset parameters, use "SET LOCAL foo" instead of plain "SET foo" (and of course, do this inside a transaction block). With the LOCAL option the parameter is guaranteed to be reset at transaction end. > Do the pooling system resets the "enable_seqscan" variable > when the connections are delivered to the clients or we > *must* do it ourselves? I think it is reasonable to expect a pooling system to deliver you a fresh transaction. It is not reasonable to expect it to go and issue explicit SET commands to undo things you've done. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: