Re: Postgresql and multithreading
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql and multithreading |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17578.1034951318@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql and multithreading (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Re: Postgresql and multithreading Re: Postgresql and multithreading |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net> writes: > On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 22:20, Tom Lane wrote: >> Simple: respond to 'em all with a one-line answer: "convince us why we >> should use it". The burden of proof always seems to fall on the wrong >> end in these discussions. > ... Now, it seems, that > people don't want to answer questions at all as it's bothering the > developers. Not at all. But rehashing issues that have been talked out repeatedly is starting to bug some of us ;-). Perhaps the correct "standard answer" is more like "this has been discussed before, please read the list archives". regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: