Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1753028.1642968443@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > Maybe we need to have a README in the tree somewhere that tries to > explain this. Or maybe we should make our build artifacts msys-aware, > if that's possible, so that this just works. Or maybe supporting msys > is not worth the trouble. I've been wondering that last myself. Supporting Windows-native is already a huge amount of work, which we put up with because there are a lot of users. If msys is going to add another large chunk of work, has it got enough users to justify that? The recent argument that this behavior isn't user-visible doesn't do anything to mollify me on that point; it appears to me to be tantamount to a concession that no real users actually care about msys. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: