Re: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 175298.1668101858@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts ("Regina Obe" <lr@pcorp.us>) |
Ответы |
RE: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts
RE: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Regina Obe" <lr@pcorp.us> writes: >> I have a distinct sense of deja vu here. I think this idea, or something >> isomorphic to it, was previously discussed with some other syntax details. > I found the old discussion I recalled having and Stephen had suggested using > @extschema{'postgis'}@ > On this thread -- > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160425232251.GR10850@tamriel.snowman.net > Is that the one you remember? Hmmm ... no, ISTM it was considerably more recent than that. [ ...digs... ] Here we go, it was in the discussion around converting contrib SQL functions to new-style: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3395418.1618352794%40sss.pgh.pa.us There are a few different ideas bandied around in there. Personally I still like the @extschema:extensionname@ option the best, though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: