Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17481.1219197053@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 07:45:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> FWIW, given that there will probably always be corner cases. I can >> see the attraction in Simon's suggestion of providing a way to >> manually issue a system-wide forced plan flush. > Would that require a system-wide plan cache to implement? No, just a function that can issue a suitable sinval message. plancache.c would already respond in the desired way to a relcache inval message with OID = 0, though likely it'll be cleaner to invent an sinval message type specifically for the purpose. One thing to think about is whether the flush should be truly system-wide or just database-wide. I can see a lot more uses for the latter than the former --- I don't think there's a reason for cached plans to depend on any contents of the shared catalogs. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: