Re: ADD/DROP INHERITS
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ADD/DROP INHERITS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17474.1149714713@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ADD/DROP INHERITS (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> In this situation, I think it's entirely reasonable to expect the user
>> to do any needed ALTER ADD COLUMN, CONSTRAINT, etc commands before
>> trying to attach a child table to a parent. Having the system do it
>> for you offers no functionality gain, just a way to shoot yourself in
>> the foot.
> Well if that's the consensus feeling then it certainly makes my life easier.
Well, one reason for my position is exactly to make your life easier.
I think that making ADD INHERITS do all these other things automagically
is lily-gilding, or at least implementing features not shown to be
needed. Let's make it do the minimum needed for the use-cases cited so
far --- we can always add more functionality later, *after* it's proven
needed.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: