Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance]
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17356.1228844042@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance] ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new
PostgreSQL software appliance]
Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance] Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance] |
Список | pgsql-www |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > However there is one big problem, the YUM repository and the EDB one > click installers are very popular and provide a big service to our > community. > Do we really want to relegate them to the sundries of a secondary page? To me the critical point is that those are produced by people we know who are at least reasonably accountable to the PG community. While I don't wish to sound like I'm badmouthing the Turnkey folk, we don't have any basis to believe that, for instance, they'll provide security updates promptly. (In fact, given that none of them are on pgsql-packagers, we can be quite sure that they'll be somewhat behind the curve for such things.) I'm not entirely sure what the guidelines for listing on our downloads page ought to be, but I think we should have some. At minimum a representative on pgsql-packagers. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: