Re: failing to build preproc.c on solaris with sun studio
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: failing to build preproc.c on solaris with sun studio |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1732827.1662303343@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: failing to build preproc.c on solaris with sun studio (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: failing to build preproc.c on solaris with sun studio
Re: failing to build preproc.c on solaris with sun studio |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 2022-09-04 Su 09:56, Tom Lane wrote: >> You would need to make the ecpg-check step >> conditional, though, so it's moot: we'd have to fix the buildfarm >> first in any case, unless it's default-enabled which would seem >> a bit odd. > *nod* I guess we could proceed like this: 1. Invent the --with option. Temporarily make "make check" in ecpg print a message but not fail if the option wasn't selected. 2. Update buildfarm client to recognize the option and skip ecpg-check if not selected. 3. Sometime down the road, after everyone's updated their buildfarm animals, flip ecpg "make check" to throw an error reporting that ecpg wasn't built. There'd need to be a separate discussion around how much to encourage buildfarm owners to add --with-ecpg to their configurations. One thing that would make that easier is adding --with-ecpg as a no-op option to the back branches, so that if you do want it on it doesn't have to be done with a branch-specific test. (I guess packagers might appreciate that too.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: