Re: SET within a function?
| От | Arthur Ward |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SET within a function? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1732.192.168.0.101.1066149839.squirrel@192.168.0.2 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SET within a function? (Edmund Dengler <edmundd@eSentire.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SET within a function?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
> Is the rewrite only for the literal 'X = NULL' or will it do a test
> against a value such as 'X = OLD.X' (and rewrite is OLD.X is NULL)?
>
> Is there any way to match NULLS to each other (as I am looking for a
> literal row, not using NULL as the UNKNOWN). I suppose I could put in a
> dummy value for the 'Not a valid value', but it seems to be quite awkward
> when I really do want the NULL.
I ended up writing an "equivalent" function for the project I'm working
on. It goes like this in plpgsql:
IF $1 IS NULL THEN
RETURN $2 IS NULL;
ELSIF $2 IS NULL THEN
-- We already know $1 is not null.
RETURN FALSE;
ELSE
-- Both args are not null.
RETURN $1 = $2;
END IF;
That's the basic idea. I put a wrapper around this to generate a copy of
it for all the data types used in my database.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: