Re: Compiling C Extension Functions against PostgreSQL 12
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Compiling C Extension Functions against PostgreSQL 12 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 173180ca-67f8-b925-fe5c-7c08de5bb9c1@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Compiling C Extension Functions against PostgreSQL 12 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Compiling C Extension Functions against PostgreSQL 12
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 5/2/20 2:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > TalGloz <glozmantal@gmail.com> writes: >> I dont understand why the output for Postgres 12 >> g++ -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute >> -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -o seal_diff_cpp.o -c >> seal_diff_cpp.cpp >> seal_diff_cpp.cpp:2:10: fatal error: postgres.h: No such file or directory >> 2 | #include "postgres.h" >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> looks different form the ones of Postgres 10 > > Looking at your Makefile, it seems to be expecting that CXXFLAGS will > be honored in the build, and it isn't being. > > As far as I can see from pgxs.mk, you're supposed to spell that > PG_CXXFLAGS. Probably, it accidentally worked to do it the other > way in v10, but no longer does, likely as a result of the fact that > there's now some minimal amount of C++ code in core PG. I was looking at that and was trying to figure out this from pgxs.mk: # PG_CXXFLAGS -- will be appended to CXXFLAGS ... ifdef PG_CXXFLAGS override CXXFLAGS := $(CXXFLAGS) $(PG_CXXFLAGS) Was wondering if this might be culprit(from example in pgxs.mk): # include $(PGXS) The OP does not have that in their make file. > > I'm a little dubious about whether overriding CXX is a good idea now, too. > (Likely the core setting is the same, but if it were pointing at a > different compiler that could cause trouble.) > > regards, tom lane > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: