Re: BUG #16184: Segmentation Fault during update
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16184: Segmentation Fault during update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17312.1577979195@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #16184: Segmentation Fault during update (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16184: Segmentation Fault during update
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > Log: > 2020-01-02 15:42:26 CET [12729]: [95-1] user=,db=,xid=0,state=00000 LOG: > server process (PID 28879) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault > 2020-01-02 15:42:26 CET [12729]: [96-1] user=,db=,xid=0,state=00000 DETAIL: > Failed process was running: UPDATE job_abstract a > SET job_status = job_status > WHERE (a.xmax :: TEXT :: BIGINT < (SELECT > txid_snapshot_xmin(txid_current_snapshot()))) AND ((SELECT Clearly a bug, but there's not much we can do with this amount of information. If you can provide a stack trace, that'd be helpful. https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Generating_a_stack_trace_of_a_PostgreSQL_backend > Reproducting this bug is not easy and I don't know which conditions has to > be met to replicate this bug. But during application is working and we made > this update, segmentation fault occurs. But sometimes it works. My gut instinct is that this might be a concurrent-update problem, which would explain the lack of reproducibility. Try to get multiple sessions to update the same table row(s) at the same time. Also, we had some bugs of that ilk on 12.0, please make sure you really are updated to 12.1. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: