Re: fixing LISTEN/NOTIFY
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fixing LISTEN/NOTIFY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17250.1128609024@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fixing LISTEN/NOTIFY (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: fixing LISTEN/NOTIFY
Re: fixing LISTEN/NOTIFY |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: > It might make sense to change the semantics so that we never lose a > notification, if we're going to implement NOTIFY 'msg', but that's another > discussion. That's pretty much a given --- the ability to pass some payload data in notifications has been on the TODO list for a very long time. I don't think we're going to reimplement listen/notify without adding it. I like your suggestion of "topic" for the notify name, and am tempted to go fix the documentation to use that term right now ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: