Re: Use LN_S instead of "ln -s" in Makefile
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Use LN_S instead of "ln -s" in Makefile |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17230.1581731167@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Use LN_S instead of "ln -s" in Makefile (Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io> writes: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 4:57 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Hm. So, these oversights are certainly bugs in narrow terms. However, >> they've all been like that for a *long* time --- the three instances >> you found date to 2005, 2006, and 2008 according to "git blame". >> The complete lack of complaints shows that nobody cares. So I think >> a fairly strong case could be made for going the other way, ie >> s/$(LN_S)/ln -s/g and get rid of the configure-time cycles wasted in >> setting up that variable. > I accede to it. Oh ... 2005 was just the last time anybody touched that particular line in backend/Makefile. Further digging shows that we've been installing the postmaster -> postgres symlink with raw "ln -s" clear back to the Postgres95 virgin sources. I didn't bother to chase down the oldest instances of the other two cases. (Man, "git blame" is such a great tool for software archaeology.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: