Re: uninterruptable regexp_replace in 9.2 and 9.3
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: uninterruptable regexp_replace in 9.2 and 9.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17158.1393735118@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: uninterruptable regexp_replace in 9.2 and 9.3 (Pedro Gimeno <pgsql-004@personal.formauri.es>) |
Ответы |
Re: uninterruptable regexp_replace in 9.2 and 9.3
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Pedro Gimeno <pgsql-004@personal.formauri.es> writes: > I'm adding this note in case it helps anyone get a bigger picture as to > what other implementations do about this problem. I spent some time looking at pcre to try to understand what it was doing backtracking-wise, and eventually realized that it's not actually trying very hard. Consider this problem: # select regexp_matches('123456789z', '(([0-9]+|9z)+)'); regexp_matches ----------------- {123456789z,9z} (1 row) To obtain the longest possible match, it's necessary to decide that the first iteration of the + operator matches '12345678', leaving '9z' to be matched by the second iteration. Postgres and Tcl get this right. Perl and pcre, not so much: they report the match as '123456789'. $ perl -e "if ('123456789z' =~ m/(([0-9]+|9z)+)/) {print \"\$1\\n\";}" 123456789 In fact, Perl doesn't even get this simplified case right, though no backtracking is required: $ perl -e "if ('123456789z' =~ m/(([0-9]|9z)+)/) {print \"\$1\\n\";}" 123456789 It seems to just fail to notice that on the 9th iteration, a longer match is available from the second OR-alternative than the first. (No doubt this is documented behavior somewhere, but it sure flies in the face of what I'd consider to be expected regex behavior.) The performance problem we're looking at comes directly from the backtracking that's done to ensure that we detect a match in case the pattern has this sort of pathological behavior. The test case doesn't actually need any such backtracking, because there aren't multiple ways to match any particular substring; but I'm not sure if there's any easy way to recognize that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: