Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17108.1144447375@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow. ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow.
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
"Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com> writes: > That said, I find typical memory bandwidth for the P4 in applications is > limited at about 2GB/s. See here for more detail: > http://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/standard/Bandwidth.html > In fact, looking at the results there, the IBM 650m2 only gets 6GB/s > on all 8 CPUs. I wouldn't be surprised if the strange L3 cache > architecture of the IBM 650 is holding it back from streaming memory > access efficiently. Given Gavin's latest report, I'm wondering how much the IBM slows down when a spinlock operation is involved. If the memory architecture isn't good about supporting serialized access to memory, that gaudy sounding bandwidth number might have little to do with PG's real-world behavior. On the other hand, we already know that Xeons suck about as badly as can be on that same measure; could the pSeries really be worse? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: