Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace

Le 15/12/2021 à 13:41, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
> On 03.08.21 19:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Gilles Darold <gilles@darold.net> writes:
>>> Sorry I have missed that, but I'm fine with this implemenation so let's
>>> keep the v6 version of the patch and drop this one.
>>
>> Pushed, then.  There's still lots of time to tweak the behavior of
>> course.
>
> I have a documentation follow-up to this.  It seems that these new
> functions are almost a de facto standard, whereas the SQL-standard
> functions are not implemented anywhere.  I propose the attached patch
> to update the subsection in the pattern-matching section to give more
> detail on this and suggest equivalent functions among these newly
> added ones.  What do you think?


I'm in favor to apply your changes to documentation. It is a good thing
to precise the relation between this implementation of the regex_*
functions and the SQL stardard.

--
Gilles Darold