Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I agree, but in a certain sense, we would have found those compilers
> already. This is not new behavour as far as I know, and clearly this
> would throw a compiler error.
[ Digs around ... ] OK, you're right, it's not new behavior; we have
instances of similarly-split comments at least back to REL6_5. I guess
my fears of portability problems are unfounded.
regards, tom lane