BUG #17045: 14 Beta Tighten up allowed names for custom GUC parameters breaks PostgREST
От | PG Bug reporting form |
---|---|
Тема | BUG #17045: 14 Beta Tighten up allowed names for custom GUC parameters breaks PostgREST |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17045-6a4a9f0d1513f72b@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17045: 14 Beta Tighten up allowed names for custom GUC parameters breaks PostgREST
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 17045 Logged by: Robert Sosinski Email address: robert.sosinski@reactive.io PostgreSQL version: 14beta1 Operating system: All Description: Recently (April 7th 2020) a new change was made to the PostgreSQL 14 beta that changes allowed names for custom GUC keys. Please see the following: 1. The code change: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/3db826bd55cd1df0dd8c3d811f8e5b936d7ba1e4 2. Initial question about valid GUC keys: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20210209144059.GA21360%40depesz.com 3. More conversation about what valid GUC keys should be: https://www.postgresql-archive.org/Tightening-up-allowed-custom-GUC-names-td6178392.html This change allows there to only be one `.` in the GUC key. The problem is that PostgreSQL uses multiple `.` in GUC keys to nest parameters, such as `request.jwt.claim.role`. As such this would be a change that significantly breaks PostgREST. You can see the conversation at PostgREST here: https://github.com/PostgREST/postgrest/issues/1857 It seems this change was mainly targeting special characters such as `-` and `=`, could this be updated to allow multiple `.` characters for GUC keys as well? There does not seem there is any issues with multiple `.` characters in GUC keys. Thanks!
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: