Re: psql doesn't show tables duplicated in multiple schemas
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql doesn't show tables duplicated in multiple schemas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1703093.1627998461@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql doesn't show tables duplicated in multiple schemas (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql doesn't show tables duplicated in multiple schemas
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> writes: > At Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:28:33 -0700, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote in >> I cannot see rewording this to avoid the use of "visible", but if this is a > Year, I think "visible" is the best word there. And I'm not sure > people are actually confused about the word. The term is actually defined in the psql ref page, in the second para of the "Patterns" section: <para> Whenever the <replaceable class="parameter">pattern</replaceable> parameter is omitted completely, the <literal>\d</literal> commands display all objects that are visible in the current schema search path — this is equivalent to using <literal>*</literal> as the pattern. (An object is said to be <firstterm>visible</firstterm> if its containing schema is in the search path and no object of the same kind and name appears earlier in the search path. This is equivalent to the statement that the object can be referenced by name without explicit schema qualification.) To see all objects in the database regardless of visibility, use <literal>*.*</literal> as the pattern. </para> Maybe this could be rearranged to make the concept more prominent, but I'm not convinced that we need any really new text. I definitely don't want to make duplicative additions to each \d command's text. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: