Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17020.955388739@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | #include oddity in v7.0b3 (Didier Verna <didier@xemacs.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Didier Verna <didier@xemacs.org> writes: > The file `libpq-fe.h' #include's the file `postgres_ext.h' using <> > instead of "" (line 27). As a consequence, applications that just do: > | #include <full/path/to/libpq-fe.h> > can't build anymore because the file `postgres_ext.h' is not in the path. > What do you think ? Was this change intentional ? It was. Someone else complained that the other way didn't work for them. At least from the point of libpq, I think they were right. Offhand, if you do not put -I into your compile switches, I'd be somewhat surprised that either way would work for you. Certainly hardcoding a full path into application source code is a completely unportable way to do things... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: