Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2.
От | Gene Sokolov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16da01bfbff4$ab46c2d0$0d8cdac3@aktrad.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: "Vince Vielhaber" <vev@michvhf.com> > Are you running any kind of filtering software? Procmail or perhaps > something built into OE? Maybe there's a header that you're keying off > of that's dumping the mail to the trash. Around the time of the test > messages was the mail2news gateway stuff, I don't know if there were any > more headers put in tho. (haven't paid attention) No, I don't have any filters. But even if the mail was dumped to the trash, I should have seen it there. I just checked maillog on our primary MX (sendmail 8.9.3). Grepping for hub.org and postgresql.org produced just 2 entries. Grepping the same log for freebsd.org produced a few dozen entries which is about the right number for the traffic there. This evidently rules out any settings local to my workstation. I tend to believe that majordomo is not even trying to deliver anything to me. Is it possible that majordomo2 can automatically consider some domains "bad" and not deliver? Something like compiling a list of domains where it once failed to deliver mail? Gene Sokolov.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: