Re: Problem with default partition pruning
От | Shawn Wang |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem with default partition pruning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16c70262d65.e85aa1f1725606.6740763146381582532@highgo.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problem with default partition pruning (yuzuko <yuzukohosoya@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Hosoya-san,
I am sorry for so late to reply to you.
I merged the patches into master(commit: 44460d7017cde005d7a2e246db0b32375bfec15d).
I tested the case I used in the previous patches and didn't find any issues.
Now I find that you are rethinking some of the details.
I will continue to pay attention to this and will follow up and feedback in time.
Regards,
--
Shawn Wang
---- On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:34:13 +0800 yuzuko <yuzukohosoya@gmail.com> wrote ----
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 1:45 PM yuzuko <yuzukohosoya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Shawn, Alvaro,
>
> Thank you for testing patches and comments.
> Yes, there are two patches:
> (1) v4_default_partition_pruning.patch fixes problems with default
> partition pruning
> and (2) v3_ignore_contradictory_where_clauses_at_partprune_step.patch determines
> if a given clause contradicts a sub-partitioned table's partition constraint.
> I'll post two patches together next time.
>
> Anyway, I'll rebase two patches to apply on master and fix space.
>
Attach the latest patches discussed in this thread. I rebased the second
patch (v5_ignore_contradictory_where_clauses_at_partprune_step.patch)
on the current master. Could you please check them again?
--
Best regards,
Yuzuko Hosoya
NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: