Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

JFYI we have 3 or 4 machines racked for the pgsql project in our DC.

Tom informed me he would be lighting them up this week time permitting.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 26, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
> * Jim Nasby (jim@nasby.net) wrote:
>>> On 4/22/14, 5:01 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>> We also have colo space and power, etc.  So this would be the whole deal.  The cluster would be up for as long as
needed.
>>>
>>> Are the machine specs sufficient?  Any other things we should look for?
>>>
>>> CC'd Tom on this email.
>>
>> Did anyone respond to this off-list?
>
> Yes, I did follow-up with Tom.  I'll do so again, as the discussion had
> died down.
>
>> Would these machines be more useful as dedicated performance test servers for the community or generic BenchFarm
members?
>
> I don't believe they would be terribly useful as buildfarm systems; we
> could set up similar systems with VMs to just run the regression tests.
> Where I see these systems being particularly valuable would be as the
> start of our performance farm, and perhaps one of the systems as a PG
> infrastructure server.
>
>    Thanks!
>
>        Stephen