Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16970.1472222694@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>) |
Ответы |
Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br> writes: > On 26-08-2016 09:25, Devrim Gündüz wrote: >> ...and we also have "pg_logical", that includes a "log" keyword already... > "clog" and "xlog" is almost "log"; "logical" is not. I don't imagine > people confusing "logical" meaning "log". Well, I dunno; people with a weak grasp of English might have an issue there. But I never liked that directory name anyway; my problem with it is I read "pg_logical" and think "logical what?". Naming things using a disconnected adjective is not good, especially one with as many potential applications as that one has. If we're up for renaming things under PGDATA, that one is high on my hit list. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: