Re: moving from contrib to bin
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16970.1418435875@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: moving from contrib to bin (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: moving from contrib to bin
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On 12/12/14 10:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think pg_upgrade should continue to have SQL scripts that create and >> delete the SQL function definitions for these. > That won't actually work very easily. LANGUAGE internal functions need > to be in fmgr_builtins, and the only way to get them there is by listing > them in pg_proc.h. (We could drop the functions in initdb, but seems > kind of silly.) Oh, good point. > The functions do already check themselves that they are called in binary > upgrade mode, so exposing them in pg_proc doesn't seem risky. Fair enough ... binary upgrade mode is not readily accessible, right? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: