Re: setFetchSize()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: setFetchSize() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16969.1058496860@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: setFetchSize() (Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: setFetchSize()
Re: setFetchSize() |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net> writes: > This isn't true any more, the backend supports with hold now, so you can > declare a cursor outside a transaction However, if the problem is that the query result is too large to hold in memory, then a WITH HOLD cursor is a terrible solution. You are simply moving the problem of coping with the fully-materialized query result out of the client and into the backend. Admittedly the backend is probably better able to cope than the client (at least it knows how to spill rows to disk...), but if you are trying to get good performance on huge result sets you do not want to use a held cursor, any more than you want to suck the whole result into client memory. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: