Re: Version number for pg_control
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Version number for pg_control |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16945.1468621343@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Version number for pg_control (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Version number for pg_control
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes: > +1 for changing it. However, I don't think it's such a big deal since > each version since 8.3 (at least) has had a unique catalog version. > Maybe this would affect pg_controldata or other supporting utilities but > the server itself should not be affected since it also checks the > catalog version. Right, that version number exists mostly for the benefit of pg_controldata and allied utilities. You would get a CRC failure in any case when trying to go between inconsistent notions of what pg_control contains, but the version number is supposed to help you figure out why that happened. As things stand, though, it'd only mislead you. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: