Re: BUG #16015: information_schema.triggers lack of truncate trigger
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16015: information_schema.triggers lack of truncate trigger |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16934.1568989957@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16015: information_schema.triggers lack of truncate trigger (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16015: information_schema.triggers lack of truncate trigger
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> writes: > This is what I found in the definition of triggers views in > information_schema.sql which says we are intentionally omitting > truncate triggers but then there is no clear cut explanation given for > this omission. The reason is that TRUNCATE triggers aren't in the SQL standard, so they can't be shown by a spec-compliant view. Concretely, SQL:2011 part 11 section 6.62 ("TRIGGERS base table") shows that column as having this definition: EVENT_MANIPULATION INFORMATION_SCHEMA.CHARACTER_DATA CONSTRAINT TRIGGERS_EVENT_MANIPULATION_CHECK CHECK ( EVENT_MANIPULATION IN ( 'INSERT', 'DELETE', 'UPDATE' ) ), Some other DBMSes think it's okay to bend the definition of the information_schema views so that they can show non-spec-compliant objects, but we don't. The point of those views, according to our policy, is to be useful to portable (spec-compliant) applications which presumably will only be creating spec-compliant objects. If somebody makes non-spec-compliant objects in the same database, and we show them in the information_schema, such an application could get mightily confused by what it sees there. In short, if you want to make Postgres-specific objects like ON TRUNCATE triggers, use Postgres-specific system catalog queries to introspect them. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: