Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16901.1399407860@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals? (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> writes: > I recall there was a call for more animals with CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS > some time ago, so I went and enabled that on all three animals. Let's > see how long that will take. > I see there are more 'clobber' options in the code: CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY > and CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY. Would that be a good idea to enable these > as well? > The time requirements will be much higher (especially for the > RECURSIVELY option), but running that once a week shouldn't be a big > deal - the machine is pretty much dedicated to the buildfarm. I've never had the patience to run the regression tests to completion with CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY at all, let alone do it on a regular basis. (I wonder if there's some easy way to run it for just a few regression tests...) I think testing CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY would be sensible though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: