Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16841.1077859531@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> I think we had previously decided that we will not allow a random user >> off the street to file bug reports into whatever system we end up >> using. > Uh, why not? (And more to the point, why raise the barrier to entry on > reporting bugs?) Our first try at a bug tracking system, several years ago, was open to anybody to create entries, and we found that the signal-to-noise ratio went to zero in no time. Too many not-a-bugs, too many support requests, too few actual bugs. We went back to using the pgsql-bugs mailing list. It could be that in the intervening time, people have gotten used to bug trackers because of their availability on other projects. If so, we might find a better grade of reports coming in. I'm not very optimistic about that though. As for raising the barrier, you can presently submit bug reports to pgsql-bugs by either mail or webform. Most of the bug trackers I'm aware of are webform-only. I don't consider that a step forward, especially since a webform isn't very conducive to making good reports (it's hard to attach test cases, for instance). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: