Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16821.1232069152@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > gah, I find that to be terrible. If we wanted to compromise, I'd > rather have \df do what it does today, to keep backwards-compat and > not confuse users, and \dfU to do what I want 99% of the time. This seems to me to be the compromise most likely to dissatisfy everyone the least ... > On a seperate (kind of) note, I'd really like to be able to say "I want > this function visible everywhere" like a system function. Huh? System functions don't have that property either. You could do that today with a quick hack on your default search path, though: set search_path = global, pg_catalog, public or something like that (... and be *very* careful about what you put in schema "global"). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: