Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16812.1033700829@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? (Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au> writes: > When talking of near-current systems with 64 bit off_t you are not > going to find one without support for 64 bit integral types. I tend to agree with Giles on this point. A non-integral representation of off_t is theoretically possible but I don't believe it exists in practice. Before going far out of our way to allow it, we should first require some evidence that it's needed on a supported or likely-to-be-supported platform. time_t isn't guaranteed to be an integral type either if you read the oldest docs about it ... but no one believes that in practice ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: