Re: Re: Release in 2 weeks ...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Release in 2 weeks ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16807.983333940@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Release in 2 weeks ... (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Release in 2 weeks ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: >> I'm interested to know what exactly takes two weeks with the docs and what >> could be done to speed it up. > The "official" version of the story is that it takes ~10-20 hours for me > to work through the docs to format them for hardcopy with ApplixWare, > primarily because something in the jade RTF tickles a bug in the page > formatting with Applix. I'm sure anything that could be done to eliminate this formatting make-work would be just fine with Thomas ;-). However, it probably wouldn't really change the release scheduling much, since as he points out it's partially an excuse for clamping down: > The reality is that it is a two week quiet time for us to get the last > bugs out and to get the last platform-specific reports. In short, now is our "okay people, let's get *serious*" phase. No features, no trivial stuff, just get the critical bugs out. > Scrappy has proposed that we start that period now. Were the concerns > about WAL etc enough to hold off on that, or are we counting down from > now? I'm pretty concerned about WAL, but have no good reason not to start the release countdown. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: