BUG #16773: GSSAPI + Msys2/mingw64 + setenv() issue.
От | PG Bug reporting form |
---|---|
Тема | BUG #16773: GSSAPI + Msys2/mingw64 + setenv() issue. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16773-c0bb1bc300bde127@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16773: GSSAPI + Msys2/mingw64 + setenv() issue.
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 16773 Logged by: George Tarasov Email address: jatoba@gaz-is.ru PostgreSQL version: 12.0 Operating system: Windows MSYS2/MINGW64 Description: Dear hackers, I am being engaged in PostgreSQL build process with GSSAPI support in msys2/mingw64 environment. Everything is good enough on REL_11_STABLE branch, but there are the following compilation and linking errors on newer versions/branches (12-stable, 13-stable, and 14-devel). Errors connect with setenv() call that isn't supported in msys2/mingw64. be-secure-gssapi.c: In function 'secure_open_gssapi': be-secure-gssapi.c:493:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'setenv'; did you mean 'getenv'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] setenv("KRB5_KTNAME", pg_krb_server_keyfile, 1); ^~~~~~ getenv libpq/be-secure-gssapi.o: In function `secure_open_gssapi': D:\postgresql\src\backend\libpq/be-secure-gssapi.c:493: undefined reference to `setenv' collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status I have read this [1], this [2], and this [3] and as i understood it's recommended to use more convenient putenv() insted of setenv(). But the function setenv() is still there and the patch proposed in [3] have not yet been approved. Please comment Is there a plan to clean code from setenv() call and will the proposed patch [3] or its revised versions be applied ?? Or setenv() is our Happy Future and PG-code will stay broken for non-common execution environments, namely those, that use, for example, GSSAPI support in msys2/mingw64. Also I have checked BuildFarm statuses and all mingw64-nodes build PG without GSSAPI/KRB5 support [4]. It looks like the mingw64 platform is no longer being considered as LTS and will be in reduced feature list in the future. Am i right? Thanks! [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/30119.1576538578%40sss.pgh.pa.us [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/29478.1576537771%40sss.pgh.pa.us [3] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEudQArtoobDWsYV300qPrg4Nms_v6DkiBiewZ9nzn+KQKd9Qw@mail.gmail.com [4] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: