Re: BUG #17083: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with OpenLDAP 2.5.x
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17083: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with OpenLDAP 2.5.x |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1677203.1625582865@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17083: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with OpenLDAP 2.5.x (Adrian Ho <ml+postgresql@03s.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17083: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with OpenLDAP 2.5.x
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Adrian Ho <ml+postgresql@03s.net> writes: > On 6/7/21 9:46 pm, Tom Lane wrote: >> As for the patch itself, I'm wondering about >> + LDAP_LIBS_FE="${ac_lib:+-l}$ac_lib $EXTRA_LDAP_LIBS" >> That seems undesirably intimate with the implementation details >> of AC_SEARCH_LIBS. Surely there's a better way? > Hmmm, good point, my Autotools-fu is not very strong. I'll see if > there's a blessed way of doing the above, otherwise I'll probably have > to test each library separately in an AC_CHECK_LIB cascade instead. Looking at the Autoconf docs, what AC_SEARCH_LIBS is specified to do is "Prepend `-lLIBRARY' to `LIBS' for the first library found to contain FUNCTION". So I'd suggest * Save contents of LIBS and set it to empty * Run AC_SEARCH_LIBS * LDAP_LIBS_FE="$LIBS $EXTRA_LDAP_LIBS" * Restore LIBS I think we have some instances of that pattern already. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: