Re: Datum should be defined outside postgres.h
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Datum should be defined outside postgres.h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16713.1193327167@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Datum should be defined outside postgres.h (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Datum should be defined outside postgres.h
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: > One solution should be put sugar words into separate header and include > them directly from catalog/*.h files. Yeah, that would probably be a good idea. It's unlikely that we'll get away anytime soon from frontend code wanting to include catalog/pg_type.h, in particular (to get the macros for type OIDs). [ looks at code... ] Another problem with #including those headers without postgres.h is going to be the function declarations --- eg. GenerateTypeDependencies() needs Node *. I've always thought that the function declarations lurking at the bottom of the catalog headers were pretty out-of-place anyway. What say we pull all the function declarations out of the catalog/pg_xxx.h files? Not quite sure where to put them instead, though. We could smash them all into one new header, but if you want to keep a separate header per module then we'll need some new naming convention to select the filenames to use. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: