Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 166a19ef-03ec-49c8-ff15-0026d6c952e7@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/05/12 10:42, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: >> We need to add PARTITION_STRATEGY_HASH as well, we don't support NULL >> for hash also, right? > > I think it should. > > Actually, I think that not supporting nulls for range partitioning may > have been a fairly bad decision. I think the relevant discussion concluded [1] that way, because we couldn't decide which interface to provide for specifying where NULLs are placed or because we decided to think about it later. Thanks, Amit [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZN_Zf7MBb48O66FAJgFe0S9_NkLVeQNBz6hsxb6Og93w%40mail.gmail.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: