Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16699.1064809727@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta) (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > I think we need someway of telling postgres to suppress a foreign key check. Well, the subtext argument here is "do we fix it by providing a way to suppress the check, or do we fix it by making the check fast enough to be tolerable?" I think the advantages of choice (b) are obvious --- it doesn't allow bogus data to be loaded accidentally, and it doesn't create a problem with loading existing 7.3 dump files that don't know how to suppress the check. If we find there is no way to do (b) acceptably well, then and only then would I want to consider (a). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: