Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16698.1396532600@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang
Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > The current quiet inline test doesn't work for clang. As e.g. evidenced in > http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=gull&dt=2014-04-03%2007%3A49%3A26&stg=configure > configure thinks it's not quiet. > Which means that postgres compiled with a recent clang will be noticably > slower than it needs to be. > The reason for that is that clang is smart and warns about static inline > if they are declared locally in the .c file, but not if they are > declared in a #included file. That seems to be a reasonable > behaviour... > I think that needs to be fixed. We either can make the configure test > considerably more complex or simply drop the requirement for quiet > inline. I object to the latter; you're proposing to greatly increase the warning noise seen with any compiler that issues a warning for this without caring about .h vs .c. For somebody who finds gcc -pedantic unusable, I would think you'd have a bit more sympathy for people using other compilers. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: