Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16689.1557158298@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices (Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices
Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 16:27, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: >> Thanks - what about also showing the associated non-toast table ? > IMHO, what makes more sense is to show the name of associated toast > table in the \dt+ of the normal table. I'm not for that: it's useless information in at least 99.44% of cases. Possibly it is useful in the other direction as Justin suggests. Not sure though --- generally, if you're looking at a specific toast table, you already know which table is its parent. But maybe confirmation is a good thing. That seems off-topic for this thread though. I agree with the stated premise that \d on a toast table should show all the same information \d on a regular table would. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: