Re: libpq thread safety
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq thread safety |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16662.1073838881@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | libpq thread safety (Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq thread safety
Re: libpq thread safety |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> writes: > But what about kerberos: I'm a bit reluctant to add a forth mutex: what > if kerberos calls gethostbyname or getpwuid internally? Wouldn't help anyway, if some other part of the app also calls kerberos. I think we should just state that kerberos isn't thread safe and it isn't our problem. For the same reason, the mutex in (eg) pqGethostbyname is an utter waste of code space. It guarantees nothing. Furthermore, any machine that claims to have a thread-safe libc will have either gethostbyname_r() or a thread-safe implementation of gethostbyname(). There is no value in our second-guessing this. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: